An LDS Perspective on War and Foreign Policy

An LDS Perspective on War and Foreign Policy

An LDS Perspective on War and Foreign PolicyThe Lord has told us to “renounce war and proclaim peace” (D&C 98: 16), yet I am surprised at how many Latter-day saints promote the opposite viewpoint. I want to take this opportunity to share some of the teachings we have received from the Lord and His prophets on this subject. First, I want to share the following message from fellow Mormon Chronicle contributor Scott Stover:

I was shocked and appalled when, in a recent presidential debate in South Carolina, the audience loudly booed Congressman Ron Paul for his suggestion that we should apply the Golden Rule in our international relations. I thought to myself, “What have we come to?” I thought of the cliche analogy of the frog who is placed in a pot of cold water while the heat is slowly turned up until he boils.

Today, I was reading D&C section 98. Let me quote verses 33-38:

“And again, this is the law that I gave unto mine ancients, that they should not go out unto battle against any nation, kindred, tongue or people, save I, the Lord, commanded them. And if any nation, tongue, or people should proclaim war against them, they should first lift a standard of peace unto that people, nation, or tongue; and if that peole did not accept the offering of peace, neither the second nor the third time, they should bring these testimonies before the Lord; Then I, the Lord would fight their battles, and their children’s battles and their children’s children’s, until they had avenged themselves on all their enemies, to the third and fourth generation. Behold, this is an ensample unto all people, saith the Lord your God, for justification before me.”

We, the members of the Lord’s church, are commanded to be an ensign unto the world. How many of us, (myself included), cheered when we took our own (not the Lord’s) vengeance on Iraq and Afghanistan? How many of us felt a sense of righteous release? We might say, “Well, times have changed. It’s no longer as simple as it used to be!” Really? Do we think for one minute that the Lord didn’t see our day when this scripture was written, when this commandment was given? Was the Lord so short sighted that His commandments, declared by His very word to have been in effect for His “ancients”, have lost their effect after only 150 years?

No!!!!! We must stand with the Lord, even in these difficult, complicated times. We must trust in His promise that He will fight our battles. We must “lift a standard of peace” as we have been commanded. We cannot side with those in this country, in this world, who would wage pre-emptive war against a country like Iran (only the most current example in a long list of transgressions over the past century).

If we are to truly be an ensign unto the nations, to be members of the Lord’s Zion – the pure in heart, we must seek to understand the commandments of the Lord; we must trust in them, even if conventional “modern” wisdom suggests otherwise. We must each stand as a voice of reason, a voice of obedience, a voice of peace. His commandments are eternal, they have not expired, and they are just as valid today as they were in the days of the “ancients” and in the days of Joseph Smith.

As is evident from brother Stover’s message, we can turn to the Lord, the scriptures and the prophets for answers to the issues we face in the world today. We can then discover the correct principles. And now some words from the scriptures:

“Now the people said unto Gidgiddoni: Pray unto the Lord, and let us go up upon the mountains and into the wilderness, that we may fall upon the robbers and destroy them in their own lands. But Gidgiddoni saith unto them: The Lord forbid; for if we should go up against them the Lord would deliver us into their hands; therefore we will prepare ourselves in the center of our lands, and we will gather all our armies together, and we will not go against them, but we will wait till they shall come against us; therefore as the Lord liveth, if we do this he will deliver them into our hands. (3 Nephi 3: 18–21)

“And it was because the armies of the Nephites went up unto the Lamanites that they began to be smitten; for were it not for that, the Lamanites could have had no power over them. But, behold, the judgments of God will overtake the wicked; and it is by the wicked that the wicked are punished; for it is the wicked that stir up the hearts of the children of men unto bloodshed.” (Mormon 4: 4–5)

Quoting from Ezra Taft Benson with regard to United States Foreign Policy:

“Ever since World War I, when we sent American boys to Europe supposedly to ‘make the world safe for democracy’, our leaders in Washington have been acting as though the American people elected them to office for the primary purpose of leading the entire planet toward international peace, prosperity and one-world government.

“…We mistake the object of our Government… Conquest or superiority among other powers is not or ought not ever to be the object of republican systems. If they are sufficiently active & energetic to rescue us from contempt & preserve our domestic happiness & security, it is all we can expect from them… (The Records of the Federal Convention [Max Farrand, Editor], 1: 402)

“There is one and only one legitimate goal of United States foreign policy. It is a narrow goal, a nationalistic goal: the preservation of our national independence. Nothing in the Constitution grants that the President shall have the privilege of offering himself as a world leader.

“Nothing in the Constitution nor in logic grants to the President of the United States or to Congress the power to influence the political life of other countries, to ‘uplift’ their cultures, to bolster their economies, to feed their peoples or even to defend them against their enemies.

“The proper function of government must be limited to a defensive role.”

(Source: Ezra Taft Benson, “United States Foreign Policy“, Preston, Idaho, June 21, 1968)

And a message from Spencer W. Kimball:

“In spite of our delight in defining ourselves as modern, and our tendency to think we possess a sophistication that no people in the past ever had—in spite of these things, we are, on the whole, an idolatrous people—a condition most repugnant to the Lord.

“We are a warlike people, easily distracted from our assignment of preparing for the coming of the Lord. When enemies rise up, we commit vast resources to the fabrication of gods of stone and steel—ships, planes, missiles, fortifications—and depend on them for protection and deliverance. When threatened, we become antienemy instead of pro-kingdom of God; we train a man in the art of war and call him a patriot, thus, in the manner of Satan’s counterfeit of true patriotism, perverting the Savior’s teaching:

“”Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven.” (Matt. 5:44–45.)”

(Source: The False Gods We Worship by Spencer W. Kimball)

Other related articles:

What do the scriptures teach us about war? (Article)
United States Foreign Policy by Ezra Taft Benson
Preemptive War & The Book of Mormon As a Record of Military Strategy by Hugh Nibley (Audio)

13 thoughts on “An LDS Perspective on War and Foreign Policy”

  1. Good article Brian, have to agree a lot of us fooled by the Afghanistan, and Iraq war because of 911 but not anymore, we need to wake up and relise that Obama’s policy is The bush doctrine and now with NDAA they can arrest anyone for suspecting them of terrorist activity and hold them indefinitely with no due process. We are in an awful situation……thanks for the article.

  2. Thanks for this article Brian. The more discourse that we have with these principles as Latter-Day Saints, the more that we can improve the thinking and perception of members.

  3. It’s difficult to break out of our past habits. I grew up with a strong sense of pride in America and in our troops. It still burns within me when God given founding principles are reiterated. What I did not understand is that we have allowed ourselves to trust more and more in the arm of flesh rather than the God of the land. The oath to the constitution that our armed forces and public servants take says that they will guard against enemies both foreign and DOMESTIC. We have allowed fear to set aside our faith in God’s protection by obedience to his commandments and replaced it with Satan’s counterfeit of trusting in the Arm of Flesh as Pres Kimball and Benson mentioned. We’ve strengthened DOMESTIC enemies. America can rise again if we Trust in the Arm of God.

    1. Because US Democrats\Liberal’s in America are responsible for promoting the horrific butchering of millions of our unborn( sometimes fully born then butchered) while also advocating wars on religion and advocating the overt destruction of the constitution in favor of corrupt European models. With such an overt enemy that attacks the family and all morals in society it became easy to assume that the opposite(republicans) were better. I still think they are better but they are also a threat. Good people allowed themselves to believe that these wars were being carried out in our best interests and the best interests of the oppressed people of the subject country. We thought we were ending some oppression not just putting it under new management. Ron Paul 2012

    2. Most of the wars in the past 100 years have been started by Democrats. Why don’t we call them warmongers? Why only the Republicans? As Ron Paul has continually pointed out, the Republican Party has traditionally been against war. Ezra Taft Benson, btw, was a Republican. What we’re seeing is the blatant merging of the two parties, the illusion of a difference between them. We should be seeking out honest men of whatever party. Our Founding Fathers warned against factions (political parties), and quickly fell into the same trap. Today we’ve taken it to a new level, thanks to the secret combinations that reign supreme in Washington. Let us not be deceived. War has no party affiliation.

  4. Mitch van Biljon

    If we simply take the Constitution and the wisdom of the founding fathers and make a comparative analysis with church doctrine we would see they are the same.

    As an immigrant I must state that most members of our faith are ignorant of the Constitution and therefore are lost in the political arena. Truth be told I am ashamed of the fact that so many members are so ignorant considering the church’s repeated instruction to educate ourselves on this important matter. They will stand condemned by the Lord as the very doctrine of agency and freedom is the foundation of the Lord’s work moving forward.

    Ron Paul is the only candidate who gets it. Harry Reid is a utter disgrace to our religion. Romney is no Constitutionalist.

  5. just hope Mitt Romney doesn`t get into power, it will be turn very bad for the church and the world in general

  6. Scott Hesterman

    Romney may become the Party nominee. There surely is plenty of evidence the leaders want him. But he cannot win against this incumbent. Too many similarities.

    We are supposed to learn constitutional principles, then vote accordingly. What I see is “Mitt’s so Mormon, (insert cultural funny here)”

    What about “Who is guided by the Constitution?” No names needed. We all know who really honors and follows it, and who relies on a bank of lawyers to keep his creative ideas in-bounds.

  7. Stephen Pritchard

    As a latter day saint in the UK my view on war is when freedom hangs in the balance then the need for defence is required but not to be going looking for a fight. Captain Moroni didn’t delight in bloodshed but was called to defend his right for freedom because the lamanites came upon them so he had to take up arms in defence. There are different kinds of warfare that rage and not always bloodshed. A financial war rages around the world, a greed power that separates the poor from the rich no equality, religious wars between other religions still rages.etc……
    But there is no perfect war there are no winners only in peace.

    1. There is a reason why the US “had” been called the sleeping giant. We’re not anymore but should be the aim of our foreign policy.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *